ci/woodpecker/push/woodpecker Pipeline was successful
Details
checking if payment is already fulfilled DESCRIPTION Invoice generation is dependent on instance_name. Deleting a VM doesn't delete the corresponding payments record since payment receipts should be preserved for accounting purposes. But being heavily dependent on instance_name, without taking deleted VMs into account produces incorrect behavior under certain circumstances: if a VM named 'foo' is paid for and is deleted before its billing cycle is competed and a new VM is created with the same name, either by the same user or a different user, invoice won't be generated for the new VM since a payment record already exists for that billing cycle for the VM named 'foo'. Marking deleted VMs' payment records unsuitable for checking if a VM is already paid for will result in correct behavior. fixes: https://gitea.hostea.org/Hostea/dashboard/issues/38 |
||
---|---|---|
accounts | ||
billing | ||
common-static | ||
dash | ||
dashboard | ||
docs | ||
infrastructure | ||
integration | ||
support | ||
tests | ||
.dockerignore | ||
.env-sample | ||
.gitignore | ||
.woodpecker.yml | ||
Dockerfile | ||
LICENSE.md | ||
Makefile | ||
README.md | ||
docker-compose-dev-deps.yml | ||
manage.py | ||
requirements.txt |
README.md
Hacking
See HACKING