Aravinth Manivannan
b12cc044da
ci/woodpecker/push/woodpecker Pipeline was successful
Details
checking if payment is already fulfilled
DESCRIPTION
Invoice generation is dependent on instance_name. Deleting a VM
doesn't delete the corresponding payments record since payment
receipts should be preserved for accounting purposes.
But being heavily dependent on instance_name, without taking deleted
VMs into account produces incorrect behavior under certain
circumstances: if a VM named 'foo' is paid for and is deleted before
its billing cycle is competed and a new VM is created with the same
name, either by the same user or a different user, invoice won't be
generated for the new VM since a payment record already exists for
that billing cycle for the VM named 'foo'.
Marking deleted VMs' payment records unsuitable for checking if a VM
is already paid for will result in correct behavior.
fixes: https://gitea.hostea.org/Hostea/dashboard/issues/38
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| management/commands | ||
| migrations | ||
| templates/infrastructure | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| admin.py | ||
| apps.py | ||
| models.py | ||
| tests.py | ||
| urls.py | ||
| utils.py | ||
| views.py | ||